by Kerry Trueman
Bloomberg News reports today that corn-based ethanol has earned the distinction of being "2007's worst energy investment."
Bill Gates and Archer Daniels Midland are among the supposedly savvy types who embraced ethanol as the solution to our energy needs. But it's not reducing oil demand, it takes more energy to make than it gives off, and it does nothing to help the environment. On the contrary, stepped up corn production means more fertilizers and pesticides and threatens our dwindling water supply.
So distilleries are shutting down, ethanol stocks are tanking and there's a glut of this stuff they can't even unload. It all adds up to a losing proposition. Why didn't these guys do the math?
Topics
Environment, News + Opinion, environment, Wind Energy, energy, Wind Power, ethanol, climate change, global warming, Gas Prices, Energy Crisis, Solar Power, Water Supply, Pesticides, Corn Ethanol, Solar Panels, Renewables, green energy, corn production, oil prices, Farming subsidies, Bill Gates, alternative energy sources, renewable energy sources, global warming solutions, renewable energy wind, renewable energy source, corn-based ethanol, ethanol produciton, ethanol fuel, renewable energy technology, renewable energy news, ethanol subsidies, renewable sources of energy, Bloomberg News, energy investments, Archer Daniels Midland, oil demand, energy needs


Comments
1