Over the past 25 years, graduating from a public university in just four years became tantamount to leaving the party before it even started. This is a notion raised by Dr. Michael S. McPherson, one of the authors of Crossing the Finish Line, released this month from Princeton University Press. Recently, Dr. McPherson spoke with TakePart about the diminishing graduation rates at public universities and the disastrous effect this trend could have on the economy.
Consider this fact: fewer than 30 percent of 8th graders will earn a BA by the age of 26. And less than 60 percent of the students entering four-year colleges in America today are graduating. Crossing the Finish Line offers a staggering amount of data that focuses on patterns of education at public universities, relating differences in academic preparedness and family circumstances among students. This information is presented in a concise fashion, with additional appendixes of data available online.
After the jump, Dr. Michael S. McPherson, president of the Spencer Foundation and the former president of Macalester College in St. Paul, Minnesota, talks about what TakePart readers can do to improve graduation rates. Q. What inspired you to get involved with the issue of public university graduation rates?
All three authors were concerned that giving so much attention to the (important) problem of getting people into college was not being matched by attention to the equally important problem of helping them succeed after they got there. And most students go to public universities. So if you wanted to change results, that was the place to look to understand the problem and begin developing solutions.
Q. What are some of the most important aspects of this issue?
Three big ones (there are others) are: -Too many able students from low-income families and families of color go to colleges that are less demanding than the best that would admit them, and that lowers their graduation rates. -Doing well in high school--getting good grades--is a better incremental predictor of graduation from college than admissions test scores. It pays to work hard in school. -Making college cheap for low income students through a combination of pricing and student aid grants improves graduation rates; keeping the net price low for high income students doesn't have this effect in our data. So directing aid or low prices toward students who really need the help makes sense.
Q. Why has education attainment in the United States been on a plateau in recent years?
The best work on this question is in the book The Race Between Education and Technology, by Claudia Goldin and Larry Katz. They show how important the persistent increase in education attainment over much of the past century has been to economic growth. They suggest that we are approaching the limit on how much we can do just by expanding grade school and high school enrollment, which was hte big task up into the second half of the last century. We now need qualitative improvement in grade schools and high schools and big improvements in getting people into and especially through college.
Q. Do you think we will be able to reach President Obama's goal of having the highest proportion of college grads in the world by 2020?
We are not forecasters. We believe that there is room for tremendous improvement and that we should start now.
Q. What kinds of actions can TakePart readers take to help improve graduation rates?
A big problem is that disadvantaged young people often lack for sound advice from people who have experience of our bewilderingly complicated higher education system, which offers many alternative options and very intricate procedures for getting financial help. A big thing individuals can do is to reach out to young people through volunteer efforts to help close those knowledge gaps--and also to support more systematic efforts in schools and communities to share such knowledge. Those who care about the issues can also work politically to get more money to students who need it, and to deliver it there simply, and can press colleges and universities to hold themselves accountable to improve their graduation rates, while maintaining high standards.
Q. What do you see as being the best and worst-case scenario for the future of public universities in the United States?
In the best case, we grasp the point that effective investment in better education at all levels is one of the best infrastructure investments the nation can make, and we focus the energies of leaders and citizens around studying the evidence and making the changes we need. In the worst case...we just don't want to go there.



Comments
7