Today's Most: Recent


Operation Bite Back: Rod Coronado’s War to Save American Wilderness Posted by Toby Shuster on August 12, 2009 at 1:54 pm

operation_bite_backOperation Bite Back: Rod Coronado’s War to Save American Wilderness, by Dean Kuipers, is an exhaustive account of one man’s lifelong efforts to take animal rights activism to a new level. We learn how Rod Coronado’s passion for the great outdoors stems from childhood fishing trips, and later develops into an overzealous commitment to preservation, leading him to be referred to as one of the “fathers of animal rights.”

Under the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) campaign called Operation Bite Back, he destroys whaling ships in Iceland, targets the American fur industry, and frees hundreds of rodents from research facilities. And some of his acts, specifically those including arson,  are viewed as terrorism.

That is why the FBI, following Coronado’s actions with Earth First! and fellow activist Sea Shepherd, labeled Coronado an eco terrorist, pushing him into a deep-seated paranoia. It is interesting to see where the line is drawn between terrorism and disruption; is Coronado on par with Al Qaeda? He never technically hurts anyone, but an incendiary bomb left at one research institute comes dangerously close to killing a janitor.

The book strives for momentum in scenes of breaking and entering, escaping, and destroying. Coronado manages to bag a bunch of babes along the way and, by a stretch of imagination, there is a Bonnie & Clyde sense of outlaw romance. Mostly, though, the bulk of Coronado’s attacks just prove to be an ineffective nuisance that amount to thousands upon thousands of dollars in damages.

The most insightful sections of the book cover Coronado’s connection to Native American rituals and the time he spends in isolation, plotting his next move and choosing his counterparts in a world before the advent of cell phones. And before being picked up by the Feds, he lives on the Pascua Yaqui reservation, helping to build a kids program, which lends him a redeemable quality.

Coronado’s application of anarchism to ecology, or green anarchism, sometimes displays a great deal of élan. Yet his wiser tactics are in using video footage to expose animal researchers to the moral judgment of the public. Breezing over claims that successful vaccines require animal testing, Kuipers lionizes Coronado’s ongoing efforts to free animals held captive in research centers.

Operation Bite Back made Coronado an idol to a generation of activists. But Kuipers is a clear admirer of Coronado, often taking pains to detail his habits and practices, often to the detriment of the overall story. Do we really need to know that Coronado had an appetite for soy lattes?

In doing so, the writer leaves little room for the reader to make up his own mind or consider objectively questions posed by Coronado’s efforts: Do all living things have equal value, and is it worth risking a human’s life for an animal’s?


CATEGORIES:  Environment, Ethics


5
Discuss
Share
Act

Required information:



Add your comment:

Page 1 of 1
Posted by Claire on August 12, 2009 at 2:11 pm

No part of me identifies with the personality trait exhibited by people who think that they can force positive change by planting bombs in labs. I don’t understand that at all.

Replies (0)
Posted by Franny on August 12, 2009 at 2:24 pm

I think the problem with books like this one is that the author cannot help but have an agenda. This book was doomed to either be a paean to Coronado, or a polemic rant about lunatic eco-terrorists. I think if you are interested in writing a book about Coronado, your neutrality has already been compromised.

Replies (0)
Posted by Jenna on August 12, 2009 at 2:30 pm

I could be interested in this book if it were more about preservation and “saving the wilderness,” like the title suggests.

Replies (0)
Posted by mortimerstreet on August 13, 2009 at 5:51 am

As a licensed animal researcher, I have a hard time understanding the perspective of people who who think it just to proect animals by injuring or killing people. Even in instances where damage is only done to property (intellectual as well as physical, in the case of laboratory research), by slowing the research process the anarchist effective injures those who stand to benefit from the cures and treatments that research strives to achieve. Certainly cruelty to animals should not be allowed, but research utilizing animal models is not cruel by necessity. I must say that I Agree with Claire, Franny and Jenna on this.

Replies (0)
Posted by HPL on August 13, 2009 at 3:06 pm

Gotta hop on the bandwagon and agree with all the comments. It’s an interesting question to ask if Coronado is on par with Al-Quada, but I think the fact that Coronado ever hurt anyone is irrelevant — he is a terrorist because he uses fear to affect change. Clearly, there are degrees of harm that that separate him from a terrorist like Osama Bin Laden, but like it or not, their tactics are the same.

Replies (0)
Page 1 of 1

Stay Informed with TakePart:

Get Blog Updates:

Archives By Month: