Once again, the courts have decided that a Bush administration decision that weakens environmental protections needs to be overturned. The New York Times reports that a federal court has ruled the following to be in violation of the Clean Air Act:
The rule had allowed power plants and factories to avoid installing the most recent controls for smog-forming chemicals like oxides of nitrogen. Instead, excessive pollution from one factory was permissible if the factory participated in a regional cap-and-trade program and bought pollution credits to cover their excess emissions.
The article states that over a dozen Bush-era rules regarding air pollution have been struck down in appeals courts, which really says something about the agenda that was set from 2001-2009. It’s amazing to think that not only are these rules detrimental to the environment, but apparently downright illegal. I feel like I’ve written, now, at least half a dozen of these posts talking about a rule from the Bush administration being shot down by appellate courts. It’s unfortunate that all this back-pedaling has to happen, but it’s nice to see that things are being rectified. Hopefully I won’t have to write too many more of these, “Hey, we’ve undone something bad” posts.
CATEGORIES: Environment
Related Posts:
Stay Informed with TakePart:
Get Blog Updates:
Blogroll
- AlterNet
- Amnesty International Livewire
- b-listed
- Boing Boing
- Brave New Films
- CauseCast
- Changents
- Climate Crisis
- Democracy Now!
- Ecorazzi
- EdNews
- Environmental News Network
- Ethicurean
- GOOD
- Grist
- Harvard World Health News
- Huffington Post
- Human Rights Watch
- Inhabitat
- Meatless Monday
- Media Matters
- NewsTrust
- NRDC Switchboard
- Rock The Vote
- SEED Magazine
- SocialVibe
- Sustainablog
- TechPresident
- The Daily Dish
- The Democracy Center
- Think Progress
- TreeHugger
- Truthout
- Why Tuesday?
- Worldchanging


No comments yet.