President Obama warned that the historic flood levels in North Dakota today are a clear sign that urgent steps need to be taken to stop climate change. Hopefully he can use that evidence to rally support from Congress so he doesn’t have to delay signing the new international agreement on climate change in Copenhagen later this year, because that would be a terrible set back. Severe blizzards and heavy rain raised the water of the Red River around 33 feet this morning, and if conditions continue to worsen the flooding could threaten the 99,000 residents of Fargo. Obama acknowledged the severity of the situation and what the implications are for the climate crisis overall in an exclusive press meeting:
I actually think the science around climate change is real. It is potentially devastating.
If you look at the flooding that’s going on right now in North Dakota and you say to yourself, ‘If you see an increase of 2 degrees, what does that do, in terms of the situation there?’ that indicates the degree to which we have to take this seriously.
As horrible as the situation is, it’s certainly reassuring to hear the President demand a proactive approach to a very real threat. Watch this video to see some of the devastation experienced by North Dakota residents today:
takepart by learning how you can help flood victims with the American Red Cross and learn what you can do to help solve the climate crisis.
CATEGORIES: Environment
Related Posts:
Stay Informed with TakePart:
Get Blog Updates:
Blogroll
- AlterNet
- Amnesty International Livewire
- b-listed
- Boing Boing
- Brave New Films
- CauseCast
- Changents
- Climate Crisis
- Democracy Now!
- Ecorazzi
- EdNews
- Environmental News Network
- Ethicurean
- GOOD
- Grist
- Harvard World Health News
- Huffington Post
- Human Rights Watch
- Inhabitat
- Meatless Monday
- Media Matters
- NewsTrust
- NRDC Switchboard
- Rock The Vote
- SEED Magazine
- SocialVibe
- Sustainablog
- TechPresident
- The Daily Dish
- The Democracy Center
- Think Progress
- TreeHugger
- Truthout
- Why Tuesday?
- Worldchanging



In South East Asia, countries like Singapore, Indonesia and Phillipines are full of islands surrounded by sea. I always have problem understanding how global warming and the rise of sea water level can affect the world as we are not seeing or hearing it yet in South East Asia. Article such as Climate Change And Glaciers Article sounds more theoritical than factual.
Information related to the case of North Dakota Floods is still quite sketchy here as we do not really understand the geographical background and how it is related to Global warming. Nonetheless every information provided by bloggers and news are very useful to us. I wish the residents of North Dakota safety and divine protection.
Thanks for your comment Ben. I agree, we do want to avoid confusing weather with global climate change, and while there is growing proof that humans have altered global climate patterns, sometimes we do have to rely on theoretical models. Personally, I’d rather not wait around to see exactly how much our greenhouse gas emissions will effect the climate, but instead I believe we should do all we can to minimize our impact. As things are, we’re certainly not doing the planet any favors.
And regarding Southeast Asia, I would say the Maldives commitment to go carbon neutral in hopes of reduce the risks of rising sea levels, is a good indication that big changes need to happen in the region: http://www.takepart.com/blog/2009/03/18/climate-change-threatens-to-drown-maldives-islands-plan-to-go-carbon-neutral/
The flood in Fargo was caused by the melting of 80+ inches of SNOW! The river stopped rising because we have had lower than average temperatures. Then we got 10 more inches of snow.