I’ve been excited about the Presidential inauguration for quite awhile now and have even considered going. New developments concerning who will be at the inauguration has me questioning that excitement as it was announced that Rick Warren would be giving the invocation. Rick Warren is the pastor at the Saddleback Church and despite a healthy relationship with Obama (they both believe in putting political difference aside to try and make change) and impressive work with AIDS in Africa, his views on many social values are quite limiting and in direct conflict with Obama’s (and mine!)
Warren is against gay marriage and helped work to get Prop 8 passed. He is also against a woman’s right to choose.
Now, I am not in any way against Obama’s friendship with Warren, in fact I am all for it. Working with folks who share differing opinions is the only way things will ever get done in this country. I do however have a problem with inviting a man, who in his beliefs would take away rights from two minority groups (homosexuals and women), to speak and be the spiritual representation at a ceremony meant to usher in a period of change.  I find it extremely disappointing, and not because I wanted Obama to choose extremely progressive and radical people to be a part of the ceremony, but because I wanted him to choose people who preach love, respect and helping others over issues that should be left to the goverment to decide, like equal rights for homorsexuals and a woman’s right to choose.
Just because you help one old lady across the street doesn’t mean it’s OK to spit on someone else. And just becuase you send some money to Africa doesn’t mean that it’s OK to compare gay marriage to incest, pedophilia and polygamy.
takepart and Join The Impact by demanding equal rights for all people.
*photo from kev/null’s flickr stream
CATEGORIES: Ethics, Human Rights
Related Posts:
Stay Informed with TakePart:
Get Blog Updates:
Blogroll
- AlterNet
- Amnesty International Livewire
- b-listed
- Boing Boing
- Brave New Films
- CauseCast
- Changents
- Climate Crisis
- Democracy Now!
- Ecorazzi
- EdNews
- Environmental News Network
- Ethicurean
- GOOD
- Grist
- Harvard World Health News
- Huffington Post
- Human Rights Watch
- Inhabitat
- Meatless Monday
- Media Matters
- NewsTrust
- NRDC Switchboard
- Rock The Vote
- SEED Magazine
- SocialVibe
- Sustainablog
- TechPresident
- The Daily Dish
- The Democracy Center
- Think Progress
- TreeHugger
- Truthout
- Why Tuesday?
- Worldchanging


My grandfather, the Reverend Clarence W. Wilson, a Baptist, admonished me not to judge Christ by the actions of Christians. It is very difficult to comply with his admonition. Religion mixed with politics is toxic. Mr. Obama as a an educated man experienced such toxicity in his most recent campaign for President. Rev. Wareen’s delivering an Invocation on January 20 is a symbolic of that toxicity especially when the Reverend’s values couched in strident rhetoric like comparing pro-choice advocates as holocaust deniers and gay marriage to incest - let along his calling for the murder of the President of Iran, a country which Mr. Obama would like to engage in peace discussion.
Thom Adams
adamstom@aol.com
A prominent, conservative, evangelical is acceptable to deliver the invocation. Rick Warren is not because of his support of Proposition 8. Would a pastor who vehemently campaigned to reinstate a ban on interacial marriage be invited to officiate at the inauguration? About as likely as the pope performing a gay marriage ceremony.