A few months back, here at takepart we told you the good news that the Department of the Interior listed the polar bear as an endangered species, the first species that is protected due to climate change. Well, it turns out not everyone thought the protection of the Alaskan polar bears was such a good idea. Specifically, the Alaskans.
The Associated Press reports that the state of Alaska is suing Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne (awesome name) to have the ruling reversed to take polar bears off the endangered species list. From the article:
Gov. Sarah Palin and other state officials fear a listing will cripple offshore oil and gas development in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas in Alaska’s northern waters, which provide prime habitat for the only polar bears under U.S. jurisdiction.
In announcing the decision to sue, Governor Palin stated, “We believe that the Service’s decision to list the polar bear was not based on the best scientific and commercial data available.” The state believes, the AP article says,
Alaska objects to the conclusion that polar bears could be endangered within the “foreseeable future,” a timeline the Fish and Wildlife Service put at 45 years, or three generations of polar bears. The state called that number arbitrary.
Completely arbitrary, I’m sure. If you happen to disagree with Alaska’s decision (you know, the decision to purchase Alaska was known as Sewards’s Folly, just saying), you can takepart and visit Polar Bears International, the site that is working at “conservation through research and education.”
CALL TO ACTION: Sign up to preview the new TakePart.com to find out more stories behind the issues shaping our world, and more importantly, what you can do to get involved.
CATEGORIES: Education, Environment
Related Posts:
Stay Informed with TakePart:
Get Blog Updates:
Blogroll
- AlterNet
- Amnesty International Livewire
- b-listed
- Boing Boing
- Brave New Films
- CauseCast
- Changents
- Climate Crisis
- Democracy Now!
- Ecorazzi
- EdNews
- Environmental News Network
- Ethicurean
- GOOD
- Grist
- Harvard World Health News
- Huffington Post
- Human Rights Watch
- Inhabitat
- Meatless Monday
- Media Matters
- NewsTrust
- NRDC Switchboard
- Rock The Vote
- SEED Magazine
- SocialVibe
- Sustainablog
- TechPresident
- The Daily Dish
- The Democracy Center
- Think Progress
- TreeHugger
- Truthout
- Why Tuesday?
- Worldchanging


they should help polar bears not hurt them
polar bears are not going to be here for ever if we do not take part. they might not be here for generations to come sooo help!!
It truly is a shame that global warming may soon take the polar bears away completely. But even more shocking is the fact that in Alaska they dont care and would rather speed up the process so they can get money from oil. It is this type of greed that has put our planet in the situation it is in.
The polar bear is nearing exstintion and all the Alaskan government can do is show us how their Governor Palin was so not ready to lead if she is willing to see the end of the polar bear for greed over oil. They should be looking to an alternative to oil and stop trying to hasten
end of our planet by global warming. Can’t they see the ice melting, the oceans rising and
climate changing right before their eyes. The polar reverse is coming and our entire way of
life is going to change if we don’t put our heads together now and work together against what is coming very soon.
those beautiful animals can not disappear they are part of the world we have been living. Everybody might be aware of it. They need the conciousness from all of us!
I adree with James Olds. It’s pathetic!!!!
i think golbal warming sucks
If they are so endangered why are the Polar Bear numbers increasing? As far as global warming is concern, why is the earth cooling down? But let’s not let the facts get in the way.