Today's Most: Recent


18 States Sue EPA Over Greenhouse Gas Emissions Posted by Nicole Hughes on April 3, 2008 at 11:11 pm

Eighteen states sued the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Wednesday for failing to limit greenhouse gas emissions from new vehicles. The suit comes one year after the Supreme Court’s landmark decision outlining that the EPA had the power to limit said emissions under the Clean Air Act. In addition to these 18 states, 3 cities and 11 environmental organizations have also signed onto the suit.

The Supreme Court ruling was viewed as a major defeat for the Bush administration given their policy on global warming. Although the administration has admitted that some aspects of climate change are human-caused, they have been widely opposed to “across-the-board” limits on carbon emissions.

“Once again the EPA has forced our hand, which has resulted in our taking this extraordinary measure to fight the dangers of climate change,” Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley said in a statement. “The EPA’s failure to act in the face of these incontestable dangers is a shameful dereliction of duty.”

EPA chief Stephen Johnson said after the April 2, 2007 ruling that the EPA would respond by the end of the year, but they have yet to do so. The suit outlines that the EPA must respond to the High Court’s decision within 60 days, but environmental lawyers say a response is unlikely while President Bush is still in office.

and contact your EPA regional office and tell them to comply with the Supreme Court decision. You can also to learn about steps you can take to reduce your own carbon emissions.


CATEGORIES:  Environment, Ethics


5
Discuss
Share
Act

Required information:



Add your comment:

Page 1 of 1
Posted by amc on April 4, 2008 at 3:29 pm

Don’t you wonder how much environmental lawyers get paid to delay things? Who does the EPA really protect?

Latest from the Washington Post:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/03/AR2008040304135.html

Replies (0)
Posted by lora bruncke on April 5, 2008 at 11:02 pm

Lawyers and scientists seem to be BSing us on many health and wellness issues tied to our economy.
How long did they get away the BS surrounding cancer causing cigarettes (not to be confused with home grown)?
I guess 10 years.
Anyone know for sure?

BS is bureaucratic spin

Replies (0)
Posted by Danielle on April 24, 2008 at 10:19 am

hi i wanted to know more about this situation…the information that is given is a little to hard for me to understand and i wanted to know if you could make it more understanadable for me…thank you please wright me back….also i would like it if you kept me up to date with everything that is going on and i need this information for a science project….once again thank you!

Danielle Metts
partner
Ysmabel Canela ( thank you as well)

Replies (0)
Page 1 of 1
Current Actions:

Stay Informed with TakePart:

Get Blog Updates:

Archives By Month: